balance in AoV (was [R] aov() and NaN)

[Remy X.O.Martin]

On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 15:27:22 +0100 (BST), <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> wrote regarding "Re: balance in AoV (was [R] aov() and NaN)"

8-) On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Remy X.O. Martin wrote:

8-) > Would it be possible to make aov like wrappers to the various special lm variants
8-) > allowing for a uniform syntax for anova?
8-) 
8-) No.
8-) 
8-) >
8-) > aov(resp~f1*f2+Error(S/(f1*f2))) ## uses lm

That's a pity. Could anybody be so kind to give an example how to rewrite the call above to make use or rlm and/or lme? If it is possible (or desirable) *at all* to do such a thing?

Thanks in advance!

RXO
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._