[R] R 1.4.0 much slower than R 1.3.1
Peter Dalgaard BSA
p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
Thu Jan 17 01:47:32 CET 2002
Robin Hankin <r.hankin at auckland.ac.nz> writes:
> R-1.3.1:
> > system.time(a <- read.table("~/people/academics/mitchell/nzsl02.27",header=T))
> [1] 40.86 0.51 54.10 0.00 0.00
> R-1.4.0:
> > system.time(a <- read.table("~/people/academics/mitchell/nzsl02.27",header=T))
> [1] 293.24 30.76 478.35 0.00 0.00
>
> The dataset in question is big ( 75306 x 27) but not desperately so.
> Am I doing something stupid here?
No. R is. This has been reported before and should be fixed in the
current patch set.
A temporary fix would seem to be to make sure that while (nlines < 5)
loop near the start of read.table actually increments nlines in its
body...
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._
More information about the R-help
mailing list