[R] Summary: Wilcoxon versus glm

[Dominik Grathwohl]

Dear Thomas, dear Prof. Ripley,

The likelihood ratio test (28.216 - 19.899 on 1df) 
did the job well:
>1-pchisq(8.3171,1)
[1] 0.003927357
And thanks for the warning in analysing sparse 
events.

Dominik
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._