[R] Plotting Speed: R vs Octave

[Chunlou Yung]

Thank you. Guess it's a plausible explanation.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liaw, Andy [mailto:andy_liaw at merck.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 08:05 AM
> To: 'Chunlou Yung'
> Subject: RE: [R] Plotting Speed: R vs Octave
> 
> 
> If I'm not mistaken, Octave does not have its own graphics system, but
> rather rely on gnuplot, which is entirely in C.  Lattice/Grid in 
> R, however,
> have a large chunk of the code written in R, for trellis 
> displays.  There's
> always price to be paid for the flexibility: try doing a simple 
> trellis plot
> in gnuplot/octave: it's not there.
> 
> Andy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chunlou Yung [mailto:chunlou at yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 4:52 AM
> To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: [R] Plotting Speed: R vs Octave
> 
> 
> 
> Just curious. Why is the 3D plot of Octave so much faster than R's? Like,
> Octave's mesh vs R's persp or lattice's wireframe.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> http://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, 
> contains information of Merck & Co., Inc. (Whitehouse Station, 
> New Jersey, USA) that may be confidential, proprietary 
> copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for 
> the use of the individual or entity named in this message.  If 
> you are not the intended recipient, and have received this 
> message in error, please immediately return this by e-mail and 
> then delete it.
> 
> ==================================================================
> ============