[R] OT: compare several graphs
garbade at psy.uni-muenchen.de
Tue Oct 23 10:21:22 CEST 2001
This sounds interesting. But this tests if the observed data differs
from a random sample. My question is if the observed data differs from
Kaspar Pflugshaupt wrote:
> On 22.10.2001 15:30 Uhr, Jan_Svatos at eurotel.cz wrote:
> > Hi Sven,
> > I am just doing something similar-
> > my graphs are densities of nonnegative r.v's (with all probability mass at
> > fixed bounded interval).
> > Then I compute their "distance" by dist (mva package needed), i.e.
> > my.dist<-dist(t(cbind(dens1$y, dens2$y)))
> > (provided that dist1$x==dist2$x, of course)
> > The problem of course is, how to decide about statistical and/or
> > "practical" significance of a difference.
> > I cannot remain myself of some correct statistical test of such hypothesis
> I'm not sure if this is statistically sound (comments, please!), but what
> about a resampling approach:
> repeat some 1000 times:
> shuffle one column randomly, then compute the distance
> compare your distance to the empirical distribution of
> "resampled distances"
> In terms of R code:
> Nreps <- 5000
> dists <- numeric(Nreps)
> for(i in 1:Nreps)
> y2 <- sample(dens2$y)
> dists[i] <- dist(t(cbind(dens1$y, y2)))
> quantile(dists, 0.05)
> If the original distance is lower than the 5% quantile of the resampled
> dists, your two graphs would be "significantly more similar" than "random
> graphs". For a two-sided test, you could use
> quantile(dists, c(0.025, 0.975)).
> If this makes sense, there is still the problem of the correct distance
> measurement. By default, dist() calculates euclidean distances. I'm not sure
> it they are appropriate for this kind of data.
> As I said, please comment. It's just an idea I had (along the lines of the
> "Mantel test").
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
More information about the R-help