[R] Post hoc tests

[Graham Smith]

In-Reply-To: <x24rxgo6we.fsf at blueberry.kubism.ku.dk>

Peter,

>The math doesn't work out as neatly..

But does that make them invalid, Conover and others certainly present 
post hoc tests for non-parametric anovas.

Cheers,

Graham S




-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._