[R] What version to choose...
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
znmeb at aracnet.com
Tue Feb 13 00:44:09 CET 2001
On 12 Feb 2001, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
> Christine Bieri <cbieri at med.mcgill.ca> writes:
> > Hello,
> > My statistical group would like to get R up and running. Right now, we're
> > deciding between putting it on a Solaris 2.6 Ultra 10 station or a Win2K
> > server Intel box.
> Depends to some extent on what people plan to use it for. The Windows
> version has menus and other GUI elements, but is a pain to develop
> extension packages for. Vice versa with Unix plus that it integrates
> with all the usual Unix tools. Installing on Solaris is quite easy if
> you have the "standard" Open Source utilities (gcc, g77, gmake, perl -
> did I forget one?), and Windows is trivial. Why not both?
I am currently using R 1.2.1 on both Windows 2000 Professional and Red Hat
Linux 7.0. I like the Windows 2000 GUI better than the X-Windows/KDE GUI, and
I haven't experienced extension development, so I can't comment there. I would
say "do both", but if you can only support one, pick the Windows version.
znmeb at aracnet.com (M. Edward Borasky) http://www.aracnet.com/~znmeb
What phrase will you *never* hear Candice Bergen use?
"My daddy didn't raise no dummies!"
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
More information about the R-help