[R] Benchmarking R, why sort() is so slow?

Peter Dalgaard BSA p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
Fri Apr 27 16:21:49 CEST 2001

"Philippe Grosjean" <phgrosje at ulb.ac.be> writes:

> I suspect it should be a question of algorithm choice. May be sort() is
> important enough, including for large datasets, to place some improvement in
> the "to do" list for a further version...?

Sure. Patches are gladly accepted...

   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch

More information about the R-help mailing list