R-beta: Bug or feature? [+ better histograms]
ihaka at stat.auckland.ac.nz
Mon Aug 18 01:42:02 CEST 1997
Bill Venables writes:
> First a bit of an explanation. Brian Ripley and I are firmly of
> the opinion that, to be any use in teaching at all, histograms
> should be nonparametric estimators of the probability density
> function. That is, the vertical scale should be a relative
> frequency density scale. It seems impossible to get this in R, so
> here is a function (+ a few extras) that does give you a "true"
> histogram, (unless you are peverse enough to request otherwise.)
Oh goody! I HATE the present hist; partly because of the
frequency/density aspect, but mainly because if I ask for 10 cells I
expect to get 10 cells, not 7 or 35 or whatever. I'd like propose
that the present hist get renamed hist.old (or something similar) and
that Bill's "truehist" become the true "hist".
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch
More information about the R-help