[Rd] Revisit c.POSIXlt , [<-.POSIXlt , [[<-.POSIXlt ?
Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono
@uh@rto_@nggono @end|ng |rom y@hoo@com
Tue Jun 16 10:59:37 CEST 2026
In 'c.POSIXlt', because 'floor' has been applied first, the final correction,
x$sec[i] <- floor(x$sec[i]) + s[i]
, doesn't need 'floor' anymore, although 'floor' doesn't harm.
_______
On Tuesday, 16 June 2026 at 02:48:39 pm GMT+7, Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono <suharto_anggono using yahoo.com> wrote:
Isn't the NEWS item too condensed?
On 'c.POSIXlt', the part from "Changes in R-devel" can be taken over:
c(x) could become one second ahead of x in R 4.6.0
On '[<-.POSIXlt' and '[[<-.POSIXlt', the following can be stated:
x[i] <- val and x[[i]] <- val now also works as intended for POSIXlt object 'x' without "tzone" attribute.
Or:
For POSIXlt object 'x' without "tzone" attribute, x[i] <- val and x[[i]] <- val now works and converts 'val' as intended.
Or:
In R 4.6.0, if 'x' is a POSIXlt object without "tzone" attribute and 'val' is not a POSIXlt object without "tzone" attribute, x[i] <- val and x[[i]] <- val failed or didn't convert 'va' to current time zone.
______
On Tuesday, 16 June 2026 at 06:25:42 am GMT+7, Martin Maechler <maechler using stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>>>>> Martin Maechler
>>>>> on Mon, 15 Jun 2026 18:08:43 +0200 writes:
>>>>> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono
>>>>> on Sun, 14 Jun 2026 13:37:13 +0000 (UTC) writes:
>> Could at least a minimalistic fix be put for the upcoming R 4.6.1? For example:
>> ln '[<-.POSIXlt' and '[[<-.POSIXlt', change
>> else as.POSIXlt(as.POSIXct(value), tz = tz[1L]))
>> to
>> else as.POSIXlt(as.POSIXct(value), tz = if(is.null(tz)) "" else tz[1L]))
>> In 'c.POSIXlt', apply 'floor' to the 'sec' component before converting to POSIXct like in Bug 18989 Comment 9 (https://bugs.r-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18989#c9).
> Yes, this *could* be done, last minute, i.e., fixing some bugs
> in POSIXlt <--> POSIXct handling.
> I've tried in my local copy of "R 4.6.1 beta".
> and indeed, these minimal patches already fix the two problems
> you mention below (and I've marked with '1.' and '2.' ).
> *However* your wish is rather late (we have code freeze in 1.5 days and
> should only fix somewhat urgent problems with small fixes),
> *and* the two problematic examples below are not new bugs, they
> do "not work" already in 4.4.x (I tried one) and 4.5.0, .. 4.5.3, etc
> Whereas your proposed changes *are* nicely small and look
> sensible, the bugs (below) have been in R for a while now *and*
> are fixed in R-devel (already with svn r89926 I think).
> So I don't know if there is anybody (but you ;-) who'd be very
> happy for such a late bug fix.
> Other opinions -- notably R core / Release Manager ?
> Thank you in any case, for the suggestion, and the effort to
> find such a minimal (informal) patch.
> Best regards,
> Martin
I've decided to commit these -- together with the
as.matrix(<POSIXlt>) bug fix, ported from R-devel.
So these should make into R 4.6.1 next week.
Best regards,
Martin
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-devel
mailing list