[Rd] structure(<primitive function>, ...) is sticky: a bug, or should it be an error?
Henrik Bengtsson
henr|k@bengt@@on @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Fri Mar 21 18:07:52 CET 2025
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 8:55 AM Martin Maechler
<maechler using stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Martin Maechler
> >>>>> on Fri, 21 Mar 2025 14:49:16 +0100 writes:
>
> >>>>> Henrik Bengtsson
> >>>>> on Thu, 20 Mar 2025 11:55:05 -0700 writes:
>
> >>> I'm pretty convinced we should fix it by checking for
> >>> primitive functions inside the C code of `attributes<-` :
> >>> arguably the bug is really there, rather than in
> >>> structure().
> >>>
> >>> Patches are welcome (via R's Bugzilla or just here).
>
> >> Thank you Martin. I'll make sure I create a brief BugZilla
> >> report on this, and hopefully a follow with a patch later
> >> on.
>
> >> One question on urgency or not: Is it too late to get such
> >> a change in for the R 4.5.0 release? I suspect so, because
> >> it has a potential of breaking existing packages. But if
> >> there's a possibility of fixing this in R 4.5.0, I'll make
> >> this a top priority. Please let me know.
>
> >> /Henrik
>
> > In such cases, I always go to https://developer.r-project.org/
> > and look at the release schedule.
>
> > Important for this Q seems
>
> > * Friday 2025-03-14: GRAND-FEATURE FREEZE (4.5.0 alpha)
> > * Friday 2025-03-28: FEATURE FREEZE (4.5.0 beta)
> > * Friday 2025-04-04: CODE FREEZE (4.5.0 RC)
>
> > So, yes there's a possibility ... but as you mentioned, too,
> > it depends quite a bit on if the fix is easily affectiong useR
> > and CRAN/Bioc package space.
>
> > Martin
>
> As a matter of fact, I'm testing already a simple patch I wrote
> myself.
> So, sorry, but I must renounce the above "Patches are welcome".
Excellent and even better (for me). Thank you Martin!
/Henrik
>
> Martin
More information about the R-devel
mailing list