[Rd] `as.data.frame.matrix()` can produce a data frame without a `names` attribute
Martin Maechler
m@ech|er @end|ng |rom @t@t@m@th@ethz@ch
Fri Mar 22 11:17:34 CET 2024
>>>>> Davis Vaughan via R-devel
>>>>> on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:10:29 -0400 writes:
> Hi all,
> I recently learned that it is possible for
> `as.data.frame.matrix()` to produce a data frame with 0
> columns that is also entirely missing a `names` attribute,
> and I think this is a bug:
> ``` # No `names`, weird!
> attributes(as.data.frame(matrix(nrow = 0, ncol = 0))) #>
> $class #> [1] "data.frame"
> #>
> #> $row.names #> integer(0)
> # This is what I expected attributes(data.frame()) #>
> $names #> character(0)
> #>
> #> $row.names #> integer(0)
> #>
> #> $class #> [1] "data.frame" ```
> In my experience, 0 column data frames should probably
> still have a `names` attribute, and it should be set to
> `character()`.
I agree.
A (very nice IMO) patch I'm currently testing is
317c317
< names(value) <- collabs
---
> names(value) <- collabs %||% character()
Martin
> Some evidence to support my theory is that
> OOB subsetting doesn't give the intended error with this
> weird data frame:
> ``` # Good OOB error df <- data.frame() df[1] #> Error in
> `[.data.frame`(df, 1): undefined columns selected
> # This is weird! df <- as.data.frame(matrix(nrow = 0,
> ncol = 0)) df[1] #> NULL #> <0 rows> (or 0-length
> row.names) ```
> The one exception to requiring a `names` attribute that I
> can think of is `as.data.frame(optional = TRUE)`, mostly
> for internal use by `data.frame()` on each of the columns,
> but that doesn't seem to apply here.
> Thanks, Davis Vaughan
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
More information about the R-devel
mailing list