[Rd] Vignettes with long compute time
Duncan Murdoch
murdoch@dunc@n @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Mon Mar 11 17:12:55 CET 2024
On 11/03/2024 11:43 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel wrote:
> Is there a way to include the compiled version of a vignette in the doc directory but mark
> it to NOT be rerun by CRAN? I think I remember that this is possible, but have forgotton
> how. (It might even be a false memory.)
You could use a method similar to the testthat::skip_on_cran() approach.
Have the long running chunks only run conditional on having a special
environment variable present. This would be a little easier with knitr
than with Sweave, since there you can use expressions for the chunk
options, but you could always write the code something like this:
if (Sys.getenv("RUN_SLOW_CHUNKS", 0)) {
... the slow code goes here ...
} else
cat("This chunk takes several hours to compute. If you want to run
it, set the environment variable RUN_SLOW_CHUNKS to 1.\n")
Duncan Murdoch
>
> Terry T.
>
> Background: Beth Atkinson and I are splitting out many of the vignettes from the survival
> package into a separate package survivalVignettes. There are a few reasons
>
> 1. Some vignettes use packages outside of the base + recommended set; psueodovalues for
> instance are normally used as input to a subsequent GEE model. Since survival is itself
> a recommended package, it can't legally host the pseudo.Rnw vignette.
> 2. The set of vignettes for survival is large, and likely to get larger. It makes
> sense to slim down the size of the package itself.
> 3. It allows us to use Rmd. (Again, survival can't use anything outside of base +
> recommended).
> 4. We have a couple of 'optional' vignettes that talk about edge cases, useful to some
> people but not worth the size cost of cluttering up the main package.
>
> The current submission fails due to one vignette in group 4 which takes a looong time to
> run. This vignette in particular is talking about compute time, and illustrates a cases
> where an O(n^2) case arises. As sentence that warns the use "of you do this it will take
> hours to run" is a perfect case for a pdf that should not be recreated by R CMD check.
>
More information about the R-devel
mailing list