[Rd] [R-pkg-devel] Problem with "compacting" pdf files.
Ivan Krylov
kry|ov@r00t @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Mon Oct 2 13:58:09 CEST 2023
Dear Rolf,
(Moving this one to R-devel...)
On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 21:01:13 +0000
Rolf Turner <rolfturner using posteo.net> wrote:
> I *really* think that the instructions from CRAN could have been
> clearer! Without your guidance I'd have been at a total loss.
Since the CRAN e-mails quote the R CMD check messages verbatim, would
it have been enough if R CMD check suggested using --compact-vignettes?
Index: src/library/tools/R/check.R
===================================================================
--- src/library/tools/R/check.R (revision 85249)
+++ src/library/tools/R/check.R (working copy)
@@ -3079,7 +3079,8 @@
" 'qpdf' made some significant size reductions:\n",
paste(" ", res, collapse = "\n"),
"\n",
- " consider running tools::compactPDF() on these files\n")
+ " consider running tools::compactPDF() on these files,\n",
+ " or build the source package with --compact-vignettes\n")
}
if (R_check_doc_sizes2) {
gs_cmd <- find_gs_cmd()
@@ -3093,7 +3094,8 @@
" 'gs+qpdf' made some significant size reductions:\n",
paste(" ", res, collapse = "\n"),
"\n",
- ' consider running tools::compactPDF(gs_quality = "ebook") on these files\n')
+ ' consider running tools::compactPDF(gs_quality = "ebook") on these files,\n',
+ ' or build the source package with --compact-vignettes=both\n')
}
} else {
if (!any) noteLog(Log)
Or is there anything else you would prefer to be reworded? Should the
message link to Writing R Extensions, section 1.4? Recently there was a
project to improve the R CMD check messages [*], but I managed to miss
almost all of it.
--
Best regards,
Ivan
[*] https://github.com/r-devel/r-project-sprint-2023/issues/55
More information about the R-devel
mailing list