[Rd] Heap access across multiple calls from R to C++
Dirk Eddelbuettel
edd @end|ng |rom deb|@n@org
Wed May 24 16:16:09 CEST 2023
On 24 May 2023 at 09:09, Ivan Krylov wrote:
| On Wed, 24 May 2023 02:08:25 +0200
| <pikappa.devel using gmail.com> wrote:
| > Is there a better way to do this?
|
| The .Call() interface (where functions take an arbitrary number of
| native R objects and return a native R object) combined with external
| pointers is likely to be a better approach here:
|
| https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-exts.html#External-pointers-and-weak-references
Yes. We had numerous threads here and on r-package-devel (better list for the
question IMHO, maybe follow-up there?) stating that new code really should
avoid .C() and stick with .Call().
| On the R side, the returned SEXP will have class 'externalptr', with
| not much to do about it programmatically. C code can additionally
| register a finalizer on the object in order to release the memory
| automatically after the it is discarded.
(And Rcpp::XPtr sets those for you if you define RCPP_USE_FINALIZE_ON_EXIT.)
A simpler approach is of course available too, and I used it too. Define
your class as you would in C++. Then define
- a helper function to initialize a class object via `new`, assign it to a
static variable or a global pointer
- helper functions for setters and getters of the values you need
- a teardown function you can call, you may even tie it to R's on.exit()
Now _you_ control lifetime and allocation. From R. If anything breaks, you
get to keep the pieces.
We can also help on the rcpp-devel list.
Cheers, Dirk
--
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd using debian.org
More information about the R-devel
mailing list