[Rd] removeSource() vs. function literals
Duncan Murdoch
murdoch@dunc@n @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Thu Mar 30 18:38:24 CEST 2023
On 30/03/2023 10:32 a.m., Ivan Krylov wrote:
> Dear R-devel,
>
> In a package of mine, I use removeSource on expression objects in order
> to make expressions that are semantically the same serialize to the
> same byte sequences:
> https://github.com/cran/depcache/blob/854d68a/R/fixup.R#L8-L34
>
> Today I learned that expressions containing function definitions also
> contain the source references for the functions, not as an attribute,
> but as a separate argument to the `function` call:
>
> str(quote(function() NULL)[[4]])
> # 'srcref' int [1:8] 1 11 1 25 11 25 1 1
> # - attr(*, "srcfile")=Classes 'srcfilecopy', 'srcfile'
> # <environment:0x55aba55a8a50>
>
> This means that removeSource() on an expression that would define a
> function when evaluated doesn't actually remove the source reference
> from the object.
>
> Do you think it would be appropriate to teach removeSource() to remove
> such source references? What could be a good way to implement that?
> if (is.call(fn) && identical(fn[[1]], 'function')) fn[[4]] <- NULL
> sounds too arbitrary. if (inherits(fn, 'srcref')) return(NULL) sounds
> too broad.
>
I don't think there's a simple way to do that. Functions can define
functions within themselves. If you're talking about code that was
constructed by messing with language objects, it could contain both
function objects and calls to `function` to construct them. You'd need
to recurse through all expressions in the object. Some of those
expressions might be environments, so your changes could leak out of the
function you're working on.
Things are simpler if you know the expression is the unmodified result
of parsing source code, but if you know that, wouldn't you usually be
able to control things by setting keep.source = FALSE?
Maybe a workable solution is something like parse(deparse(expr, control
= "exact"), keep.source = FALSE). Wouldn't work on environments or
various exotic types, but would probably warn you if it wasn't working.
Duncan Murdoch
More information about the R-devel
mailing list