[Rd] logic tweak needed for as.data.frame.<class> deprecation warning
Martin Maechler
m@ech|er @end|ng |rom @t@t@m@th@ethz@ch
Fri Jul 7 18:46:34 CEST 2023
>>>>> Mikael Jagan
>>>>> on Thu, 6 Jul 2023 11:32:00 -0400 writes:
> Continuing the thread started on R-package-devel, here:
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2023q3/009307.html
> The logic of the now soft-deprecated as.data.frame.<class>,
>> body(as.data.frame.integer)[[2L]]
> if ((sys.nframe() <= 1L || sys.call(-1L)[[1L]] != quote(as.data.frame)) &&
> nzchar(Sys.getenv("_R_CHECK_AS_DATA_FRAME_EXPLICIT_METHOD_")))
> .Deprecated(msg = gettextf("Direct call of '%s()' is deprecated. Use '%s()' or
> '%s()' instead",
> "as.data.frame.integer", "as.data.frame.vector", "as.data.frame"))
> may need adjustment to avoid false positives such as this one:
>> Sys.setenv("_R_CHECK_AS_DATA_FRAME_EXPLICIT_METHOD_" = TRUE)
>> f <- as.data.frame
>> f(0L)
> 0L
> 1 0
> Warning message:
> Direct call of 'as.data.frame.integer()' is deprecated. Use
> 'as.data.frame.vector()' or 'as.data.frame()' instead
> i.e., the condition sys.call(-1L)[[1L]] != quote(as.data.frame) is not precise
> enough ... would !identical(sys.function(-1L), as.data.frame) work instead?
> Mikael
Thank you, Mikael!
Indeed, as I see that it seems not even more costly than using sys.call(),
*and* because you gave me a case, where the previous, even
updated code, even lead to an error:
> mapply(as.data.frame, x=1:10, row.names=letters[1:10])
Error in (c1 <- sys.call(-1L)[[1L]]) != quote(as.data.frame) :
comparison (!=) is possible only for atomic and list types
I have amended the code, using sys.function(-1L) in the first check
which does fix the above error and catches more false positives.
This is now in R-devel svn rev >= 84653
and is planned to eventually be ported to the R 4.3.x series,
i.e., currently "R 4.3.1 patched".
Martin
More information about the R-devel
mailing list