[Rd] Possible NA Propagation Failure in RISC-V64 CPU?
Ivan Krylov
kry|ov@r00t @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Fri Feb 24 14:02:02 CET 2023
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 15:39:08 -0800
Jane He <siyaoh4 using uci.edu> wrote:
> In short, according to my understanding of R's convention, any
> calculation involving NA but no NaN should result in NA (called NA
> propagation), and any calculation involving NaN but no NA should
> result in NaN. Calculations involving both NA and NaN can result in
> either value.
The ?NA help page already contains a warning that "future CPUs and/or
compilers" may prevent NA from resulting in computations with NA. A
similar problem has been encountered on Apple processors, but a
workaround was found there:
https://blog.r-project.org/2020/11/02/will-r-work-on-apple-silicon/#nanan-payload-propagation
> This failure in NA propagation may cause many R packages like mice to
> not work properly, and results in the `make check` test in the
> `stats` package to fail.
Perhaps the way forward is to update the tests.
Regarding R packages, since is.na() is already documented to return
TRUE for all NaNs, not only the NA value, it should be possible to make
them work even if they currently fail.
--
Best regards,
Ivan
More information about the R-devel
mailing list