[Rd] Floating Point with POSIXct
Duncan Murdoch
murdoch@dunc@n @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Thu Mar 3 20:38:28 CET 2022
On 03/03/2022 11:52 a.m., Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>> John Muschelli
>>>>>> on Thu, 3 Mar 2022 11:04:05 -0500 writes:
>>>>>> John Muschelli
>>>>>> on Thu, 3 Mar 2022 11:04:05 -0500 writes:
>
> > I see in ?POSIXct and I'm trying to understand the note:
> >> Classes "POSIXct" and "POSIXlt" are able to express fractions of a second. (Conversion of fractions between the two forms may not be exact, but will have better than microsecond accuracy.)
>
> > Mainly, I'm trying to understand printing of POSIXct with fractional
> > seconds. I see print.POSIXct calls format.POSIXct and eventually
> > calls format.POSIXlt, which then takes into account `digits.secs` for
> > printing. The format uses %OS3, which strptime indicates (* added):
>
> >> Specific to R is %OSn, which for output gives the seconds *truncated* to 0 <= n <= 6 decimal places (and if %OS is not followed by a digit, it uses the setting of getOption("digits.secs"), or if that is unset, n = 0).
>
> > So I'm seeing it truncates the seconds to 3 digits, so I think that is
> > why the below is printing 0.024.
>
> > I think this is especially relevant even if you set
> > `options(digits.secs = 6)`, then the code in
> > format.POSIXlt would still return np=3 as the following condition
> > would break at i = 3
>
> > for (i in seq_len(np) - 1L)
> > if (all(abs(secs - round(secs, > i)) < 1e-06)) {
> > np <- i
> > break
> > }
>
> > as sub_seconds - round(sub_seconds,3) < 1e-06. This seems to be
> > expected behavior given the docs, but would any consider this a bug?
>
>
> > Example:
>
> > options(digits.secs = 4)
> > x = structure(947016000.025, class = c("POSIXct", "POSIXt"), tzone = "UTC")
>
> I think you've fallen into the R FAQ 7.31 trap :
>
>> ct <- 947016000.025
>> ct %% 1
> [1] 0.02499998
>>
>
> Of course, the issue may still be somewhat interesting, ...
>
> Yes, POSIXct is of limited precision and I think the help page
> you mentioned did document that that's one reason for using
> POSIXlt instead, as there, sub second accuracy can be much better.
>
> But FAQ 7.31 and the fact that all numbers are base 2 and in
> base 2, no decimal <n>.025 can be represented in full accuracy.
>
> Also, as you've noticed the R POSIX[cl]t code just truncates,
> i.e. rounds towards 0 unconditionally, and I tend to agree that it
> should rather round than truncate.
If you print the hour and minute at 01:59:59, you get 1 and 59, not 2
and 0. That may be the motivation for doing the same for fractional
seconds. Should 1:59:59.9 really print as 2:00:00?
Duncan Murdoch
>
> But we should carefully separate the issues here, from the
> underlying inherent FAQ 7.31 truth that most decimal numbers in
> a computer are not quite what they look like ...
>
> Martin Maechler
> ETH Zurich and R Core Team (also author of the CRAN package 'round')
>
>
> > summary(x, digits = 20)
> > #> Min. 1st Qu. Median
> > #> "2000-01-04 20:00:00.024" "2000-01-04 20:00:00.024" "2000-01-04 20:00:00.024"
> > #> Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
> > #> "2000-01-04 20:00:00.024" "2000-01-04 20:00:00.024" "2000-01-04 20:00:00.024"
> > x
> > #> [1] "2000-01-04 20:00:00.024 UTC"
> > format.POSIXct(x, format = "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%OS3")
> > #> [1] "2000-01-04 20:00:00.024"
> > format.POSIXct(x, format = "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%OS4")
> > #> [1] "2000-01-04 20:00:00.0249"
> > sub_seconds = as.numeric(x) %% 1
> > sub_seconds
> > #> [1] 0.02499998
> > round(sub_seconds, 3)
> > #> [1] 0.025
>
> > rounded = as.POSIXct(
> > floor(as.numeric(x)) +
> > round(as.numeric(x) %% 1, 3),
> > origin = "1970-01-01")
> > rounded
> > #> [1] "2000-01-04 20:00:00.024 UTC"
> > as.numeric(rounded) %% 1
> > #> [1] 0.02499998
>
> > R.version
> > _
> > platform x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> > arch x86_64
> > os linux-gnu
> > system x86_64, linux-gnu
> > status
> > major 4
> > minor 1.2
> > year 2021
> > month 11
> > day 01
> > svn rev 81115
> > language R
> > version.string R version 4.1.2 (2021-11-01)
> > nickname Bird Hippie
>
>
>
> > Best,
> > John
>
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
More information about the R-devel
mailing list