[Rd] replicate evaluates its second argument in wrong environment
Hadley Wickham
h@w|ckh@m @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Mon Feb 15 22:10:07 CET 2021
This is a nice example of the motivation for tidy evaluation — since
enquo() captures the environment in which the promise should be
evaluated, there's no need for an additional explicit argument.
library(rlang)
replicate2 <- function (n, expr, simplify = "array") {
exnr <- enquo(expr)
sapply(integer(n), function(i) eval_tidy(expr), simplify = simplify)
}
doRep2 <- function(a, b) sapply(a, replicate2, b)
doRep2(3, 2)
#> [,1]
#> [1,] 2
#> [2,] 2
#> [3,] 2
Hadley
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 7:09 AM Gabor Grothendieck
<ggrothendieck using gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Currently replicate used within sapply within a function can fail
> because it gets the environment for its second argument, which is
> currently hard coded to be the parent frame, wrong. See this link for
> a full example of how it goes wrong and how it could be made to work
> if it were possible to pass an envir argument to it.
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66184446/sapplya-replicate-b-expression-no-longer-works-inside-a-function/66185079#66185079
>
> --
> Statistics & Software Consulting
> GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc.
> tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP
> email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
--
http://hadley.nz
More information about the R-devel
mailing list