[Rd] reshape documentation

[Deepayan Sarkar]

On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 7:07 PM SOEIRO Thomas <Thomas.SOEIRO using ap-hm.fr> wrote:
>
> Dear Deepayan,
>
> I do not have further suggestions, but I just wanted to thank you for taking the time to
> improve the documentation so much! (and for adding support for specifying "varying" as
> a vector)
>
> Both "Typical usage" and the details are useful additions. Adding a vignette also seems
> an excellent idea.

Thanks for checking. I have also finally added a vignette, do let me
know if you see anything that can be improved.

Best,
-Deepayan

>
> These changes will probably helps numerous users.
>
> Best,
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 7:55 PM Michael Dewey <lists using dewey.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Comments in line
> >
> > On 13/03/2021 09:50, SOEIRO Thomas wrote:
> > > Dear list,
> > >
> > > I have some questions/suggestions about reshape.
> > >
> > > 1) I think a good amount of the popularity of base::reshape alternative is due to the complexity of reshape documentation. It is quite hard (at least it is for me) to figure out what argument is needed for respectively "long to wide" and "wide to long", because reshapeWide and reshapeLong are documented together.
> > > - Do you agree with this?
> > > - Would you consider a proposal to modify the documentation?
> > > - If yes, what approach do you suggest? e.g. split in two pages?
> >
> > The current documentation is much clearer than it was when I first
> > started using R but we should always strive for more.
> >
> > I would suggest leaving the documentation in one place but it might be
> > helpful to add which direction is relevant for each parameter by placing
> > (to wide) or (to long) as appropriate. I think having completely
> > separate lists is not needed
>
> I have just checked in some updates to the documentation (in R-devel)
> which hopefully makes usage clearer. Any further suggestions are
> welcome. We are planning to add a short vignette as well, hopefully in
> time for R 4.1.0.
>
> > > 2) I do not think the documentation indicates that we can use varying argument to rename variables in reshapeWide.
> > > - Is this worth documenting?
> > > - Is the construct list(c()) really needed?
> >
> > Yes, because you may have more than one set of variables which need to
> > correspond to a single variable in long format. So in your example if
> > you also had 11 variables for the temperature as well as the
> > concentration each would need specifying as a separate vector in the list.
>
> That's a valid point, but on the other hand, direction="long" already
> supports specifying 'varying' as a vector, and it does simplify the
> single variable case. So we decided to be consistent and allow it for
> direction="wide" too, hopefully with loud enough warnings in the
> documentation about using the feature carelessly.
>
> Best,
> -Deepayan
>
> > Michael
> >
> > >
> > > reshape(Indometh,
> > >          v.names = "conc",
> > >          idvar = "Subject",
> > >          timevar = "time",
> > >          direction = "wide",
> > >          varying = list(c("conc_0.25hr",
> > >                           "conc_0.5hr",
> > >                           "conc.0.75hr",
> > >                           "conc_1hr",
> > >                           "conc_1.25hr",
> > >                           "conc_2hr",
> > >                           "conc_3hr",
> > >                           "conc_4hr",
> > >                           "conc_5hr",
> > >                           "conc_6hr",
> > >                           "conc_8hr")))
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Thomas
> > > ______________________________________________
> > > R-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Michael
> > http://www.dewey.myzen.co.uk/home.html
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel