[Rd] Is missingness always passed on?
Duncan Murdoch
murdoch@dunc@n @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Mon Sep 30 16:17:34 CEST 2019
There's a StackOverflow question
https://stackoverflow.com/q/22024082/2554330 that references this text
from ?missing:
"Currently missing can only be used in the immediate body of the
function that defines the argument, not in the body of a nested function
or a local call. This may change in the future."
Someone pointed out (in https://stackoverflow.com/a/58169498/2554330)
that this isn't true in the examples they've tried: missingness does
get passed along. This example shows it (this is slightly different
than the SO example):
f1 <- function(x, y, z){
if(missing(x))
cat("f1: x is missing\n")
if(missing(y))
cat("f1: y is missing\n")
}
f2 <- function(x, y, z){
if(missing(z))
cat("f2: z is missing\n")
f1(x, y)
}
f2()
which produces
f2: z is missing
f1: x is missing
f1: y is missing
Is the documentation out of date? That quote appears to have been
written in 2002.
Duncan Murdoch
More information about the R-devel
mailing list