[Rd] typeof(getOption("warn")) is "integer" instead of "double" in R unstable (2019-09-27 r77229)? Reproducible?

[@osp@m m@iii@g oii @itieid-im@de]

Thanks a lot for pointing out the reason
(and yes, I am testing quite to stringent in this case - it's my old testing disease ;-)

For other readers:

The R-devel NEWS is a good source to find possible change reasons:

https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/doc/html/NEWS.html


On Sun, 2019-09-29 at 08:33 -0400, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 29/09/2019 7:55 a.m., nospam using altfeld-im.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have a failing unit test in my package tryCatchLog on the CRAN build infrastructure
> > (https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_tryCatchLog.html)
> > with "R Under development (unstable) (2019-09-27 r77229)"
> > and the unit tests just ensures consistent behaviour of R (not of my package) as a precondition:
> > 
> > The failing unit test is caused by
> > > typeof(getOption("warn"))
> > > [1] "integer"
> > 
> > but it should be
> > > [1] "double"
> 
> This is related to this bug fix:
> 
> CHANGES IN R 3.6.1 patched BUG FIXES
> 
>      ‘options(warn=1e11)’ is an error now, instead of later leading to C 
> stack overflow because of infinite recursion.
> 
> which occurred in rev 77226.  It explicitly coerces the warn value to 
> integer.
> 
> 
> > I have no build infrastructure for dev and want to find out if this is caused by
> > - my mistake
> > - changes in the R dev version
> > - the new C compilers used (correlates with the failing unit test)
> 
> It is changes in the dev and patched versions, and also your mistake: 
> your test shouldn't be so stringent.  The docs don't say that the value 
> has to be a double; in fact, they suggest it should be a whole number 
> value (talking about 0, 1, "2 or more", not about what would happen with 
> options(warn = pi/2), for example.
> 
> In older versions, options(warn = pi/2) is treated the same as 
> options(warn = 1), and in the new version, it is displayed as 1 as well.
> 
> Duncan Murdoch
> > 
> > Can somebody (having the R dev version available) please help me and answer the result of
> > 
> > > typeof(getOption("warn"))
> > 
> > using "R Under development (unstable) (2019-09-27 r77229)" or newer?
> > 
> > Thanks a lot and sorry for the "noise"!
> > 
> > Jurgen
> > 
> > PS: These R (dev) versions did work as expected (returning "double") but were also using older C compilers:
> > - R Under development (unstable) (2019-09-20 r77199)
> > - R Under development (unstable) (2019-09-22 r77202)
> > - R Under development (unstable) (2019-09-25 r77217)
> > - R version 3.6.1 Patched (2019-09-25 r77224)
> > - R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05)
> > - R version 3.6.0 beta (2019-04-15 r76395)
> > - R version 3.5.3 (2019-03-11)
> > - R version 3.5.2 (2018-12-20)
> > 
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> > 
> 
>