[Rd] R-Forge > GitHub?
Spencer Graves
@pencer@gr@ve@ @end|ng |rom prod@y@e@com
Wed Jun 26 16:34:46 CEST 2019
Hello, All:
What's the status and future plans for R-Forge?
I ask primarily because a problem I reported May 15 and 17 via
two different channels has yet to be fixed, and it prevents my
development versions of the Ecdat and Ecfun packages from building --
because the Windows version cannot find "Matrix"; see below.
Secondarily, the version of R that R-Forge tried to use earlier today
was 3.5.3 -- NOT the current version.
Assuming you recommend migrating to GitHub, do you have a
preferred procedure? I found
"https://gist.github.com/friendly/7269490". This says it was "Last
active 2 years ago" but seems to be the most current advice I can find
on this right now. That looks complicated, but I assume it preserves
the edit history on R-Forge. ???
Thanks,
Spencer Graves
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Error : package 'Ecfun' could not be loaded
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 18:41:12 -0500
From: Spencer Graves <spencer.graves using prodsyse.com>
To: r-forge using r-project.org
Hello:
Your Windows platform cannot find "Matrix" and other packages. See:
https://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group_id=1439&add_log=check_x86_64_windows&pkg=Ecdat&flavor=patched&type=00install.out
I reported this to your Support tracker two days ago:
https://r-forge.r-project.org/tracker/?atid=194&group_id=34&func=browse
Can someone please fix this?
Or is it now the official policy of R-Forge to ask people to go
someplace else, e.g., GitHub?
From what I know, the basic design of R-Forge is vastly superior
to GitHub for packages submitted to CRAN. However, I've encountered
numerous reliability problems with R-Forge in recent years.
Thanks,
Spencer Graves
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-devel
mailing list