[Rd] R CMD check issue
hugh@p@r@on@ge @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Wed Aug 28 18:36:38 CEST 2019
The warning is that the vignette failed to be rebuilt due to an error in
its code. The error log was truncated.
Of course for practical purposes errors and warnings both constitute check
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 1:56 am, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel <
r-devel using r-project.org> wrote:
> I'm running "R CMD check" for 600+ of the packages that depend on
> survival, and at the end
> look for
> grep Status *.Rcheck/00check.log | grep ERROR
> to find any that failed. But by accident I just looked at the log for
> the Greg package,
> which finishes with the lines found below. Is the final note of WARNING
> rather than ERROR
> on purpose, or an error? If the former, will adding a search for
> "Quitting from" suffice?
> By the way, the failure shown was an (uncaught) bug in cox.zph wrt putting
> dimnames on one
> of the result matrices.
> Terry T
> --- re-building ‘timeSplitter.Rmd’ using rmarkdown
> Loading required package: forestplot
> Loading required package: grid
> Loading required package: checkmate
> Loading required package: Gmisc
> Loading required package: Rcpp
> Loading required package: htmlTable
> Attaching package: 'dplyr'
> The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
> filter, lag
> The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
> intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
> Quitting from lines 408-412 (timeSplitter.Rmd)
> Error: processing vignette 'timeSplitter.Rmd' failed with diagnostics:
> length of 'dimnames'  not equal to array extent
> --- failed re-building ‘timeSplitter.Rmd’
> SUMMARY: processing the following file failed:
> Error: Vignette re-building failed.
> Execution halted
> * checking PDF version of manual ... OK
> * DONE
> Status: 1 WARNING
> for details.
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> R-devel using r-project.org mailing list
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-devel