[Rd] Inappropriate parens fix for Logic.Rd

[Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono]

Logic.Rd has been changed again in r74377. After change:
  \item{x, y}{raw or logical or \sQuote{number-like} vectors (i.e., of
    types \code{\link{double}} (class \code{\link{numeric}},
    \code{\link{integer}}) and \code{\link{complex}}), or objects for

It is still inappropriate. As I said before, integer is not double.

Right: numeric includes double and integer
Wrong: double includes numeric and integer

The text mentions "type" and "class". I believe that, in the text, originally, "type" refers to what is returned by typeof() and "class" refers to what is returned by class() in R.
When typeof(x) is "double", class(x) is "numeric".
When typeof(x) is "integer", class(x) is "integer".

--------------------------------------------

> wrote:

 Subject: Inappropriate parens fix for Logic.Rd
 To: r-devel at r-project.org
 Date: Saturday, 10 March, 2018, 8:23 AM

Logic.Rd is one of the files changed in r74363.

Before change:
  \item{x, y}{raw or logical or \sQuote{number-like} vectors (i.e., of types
    \code{\link{double}} (class \code{\link{numeric}}), \code{\link{integer}}
    and \code{\link{complex}})), or objects for

After change:
  \item{x, y}{raw or logical or \sQuote{number-like} vectors (i.e., of types
    \code{\link{double}} (class \code{\link{numeric}}, \code{\link{integer}}
    and \code{\link{complex}})), or objects for

Neither integer nor complex is double.
I think, it should be
  \item{x, y}{raw or logical or \sQuote{number-like} vectors (i.e., of types
    \code{\link{double}} (class \code{\link{numeric}}), \code{\link{integer}}
    and \code{\link{complex}}), or objects for