[Rd] unlicense

[Brian G. Peterson]

On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 22:46 -0500, Kevin Ushey wrote:
> It appears that Unlicense is considered a free and GPL-compatible
> license; however, the page does suggest using CC0 instead (which is
> indeed a license approved / recognized by CRAN). CC0 appears to be
> the primary license recommended by the FSF for software intended for
> the public domain.

I'd second the recommendation for CC0.  Lawyers at IP-restrictive firms
I've worked for in the past have been OK with this license.

 - Brian