[Rd] compile question
aixtools at gmail.com
Wed Nov 25 14:49:57 CET 2015
On 2015-11-23 23:33, Paul Grosu wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> I experienced the same thing in the past. After you get the R-3.2.2.tar.gz
> and uncompress it, enter the R-3.2.2 directory and run the ./configure and
> make from there, rather than a different one.
I have been able to get a 32-bit build, easily, with R-3.1.3, and I
think also with R-3.2.2. But the 64-bit builds have not been
straightforward. Unusual and/or unexpected messages.
As a lot of packaging changes have been made - noteably the removal of
several libraries that must now come from the system - make me think
that focusing on the R-devel branch is more relevant.
However, I should probably revisit R-3.2.2!
> One other thing, you probably already did this, but just in case you might
> want to double-check this section as well:
Yes, I have been using this - and it helps.
> Hope it helps,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: R-devel [mailto:r-devel-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of aixtools
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 4:31 PM
> To: r-devel at r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] compile question
> On 2015-11-23 18:52, aixtools wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> Starting all over again with R-devel of 22-11-2015.
>> After getting the dependancies (minimal graphics initially) I have
>> been able to come this far - with a 64-bit build on AIX.
More information about the R-devel