[Rd] R-devel does not update the C++ returned variables
Martin Morgan
mtmorgan at fredhutch.org
Mon Mar 2 21:24:12 CET 2015
On 03/02/2015 11:39 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 2 March 2015 at 16:37, Martin Maechler wrote:
> |
> | > On 2 March 2015 at 09:09, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> | > | I generally recommend that people use Rcpp, which hides a lot of the
> | > | details. It will generate your .Call calls for you, and generate the
> | > | C++ code that receives them; you just need to think about the real
> | > | problem, not the interface. It has its own learning curve, but I think
> | > | it is easier than using the low-level code that you need to work with .Call.
> |
> | > Thanks for that vote, and I second that.
> |
> | > And these days the learning is a lot flatter than it was a decade ago:
> |
> | > R> Rcpp::cppFunction("NumericVector doubleThis(NumericVector x) { return(2*x); }")
> | > R> doubleThis(c(1,2,3,21,-4))
> | > [1] 2 4 6 42 -8
> | > R>
> |
> | > That defined, compiled, loaded and run/illustrated a simple function.
> |
> | > Dirk
> |
> | Indeed impressive, ... and it also works with integer vectors
> | something also not 100% trivial when working with compiled code.
> |
> | When testing that, I've went a step further:
>
> As you may know, int can be 'casted up' to double which is what happens
> here. So in what follows you _always_ create a copy from an int vector to a
> numeric vector.
>
> For pure int, use eg
>
> Rcpp::cppFunction("IntegerVector doubleThis(IntegeerVector x) { return(2*x); }")
>
> and rename the function names as needed to have two defined concurrently.
avoiding duplication, harmless in the doubleThis() case, comes at some
considerable hazard in general
> Rcpp::cppFunction("IntegerVector incrThisAndThat(IntegerVector x) { x[0] +=
1; return x; }")
> x = y = 1:5
> incrThisAndThat(x)
[1] 2 2 3 4 5
> x
[1] 2 2 3 4 5
> y
[1] 2 2 3 4 5
(how often this happens in the now relatively large number of user-contributed
packages using Rcpp?). It seems like 'one-liners' should really encourage
something safer (sometimes at the expense of 'speed'),
Rcpp::cppFunction("IntegerVector doubleThis(const IntegerVector x) { return x
* 2; }")
Rcpp::cppFunction("std::vector<int> incrThis(std::vector<int> x) { x[0] += 1;
return x; }")
or that Rcpp should become more careful (i.e., should not allow!) modifying
arguments with NAMED != 0.
Martin (Morgan)
>
> Dirk
>
> |
> | ##---- now "test":
> | require(microbenchmark)
> | i <- 1:10
> | (mb <- microbenchmark(doubleThis(i), i*2, 2*i, i*2L, 2L*i, i+i, times=2^12))
> | ## Lynne (i7; FC 20), R Under development ... (2015-03-02 r67924):
> | ## Unit: nanoseconds
> | ## expr min lq mean median uq max neval cld
> | ## doubleThis(i) 762 985 1319.5974 1124 1338 17831 4096 b
> | ## i * 2 124 151 258.4419 164 221 22224 4096 a
> | ## 2 * i 127 154 266.4707 169 216 20213 4096 a
> | ## i * 2L 143 164 250.6057 181 234 16863 4096 a
> | ## 2L * i 144 177 269.5015 193 237 16119 4096 a
> | ## i + i 152 183 272.6179 199 243 10434 4096 a
> |
> | plot(mb, log="y", notch=TRUE)
> | ## hmm, looks like even the simple arithm. differ slightly ...
> | ##
> | ## ==> zoom in:
> | plot(mb, log="y", notch=TRUE, ylim = c(150,300))
> |
> | dev.copy(png, file="mbenchm-doubling.png")
> | dev.off() # [ <- why do I need this here for png ??? ]
> | ##--> see the appended *png graphic
> |
> | Those who've learnt EDA or otherwise about boxplot notches, will
> | know that they provide somewhat informal but robust pairwise tests on
> | approximate 5% level.
> | >From these, one *could* - possibly wrongly - conclude that
> | 'i * 2' is significantly faster than both 'i * 2L' and also
> | 'i + i' ---- which I find astonishing, given that i is integer here...
> |
> | Probably no reason for deep thoughts here, but if someone is
> | enticed, this maybe slightly interesting to read.
> |
> | Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
> |
> | [DELETED ATTACHMENT mbenchm-doubling.png, PNG image]
>
--
Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N.
PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109
Location: Arnold Building M1 B861
Phone: (206) 667-2793
More information about the R-devel
mailing list