[Rd] R CMD check warning with S3 method

[Yihui Xie]

Hi Duncan,

Again, thanks a lot for making this change (help requests are tried
over all loaded instead of attached packages):
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/21d2f7430b4 This makes what I
proposed last time possible now: if pkg B imports FUN from A and
re-exports it, ?FUN will work after B is attached because A will also
be at least attached.

Then it will be perfect if `R CMD check` can stop warning against the
missing documentation, which is not really missing.

Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie <xieyihui at gmail.com>
Web: http://yihui.name


On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Yihui Xie <xie at yihui.name> wrote:
> but note that you will have to document it even if it is a function
> imported from another package... Perhaps help() should be intelligent
> enough to link the documentation of `FUN` from package A for package B
> when B imports `FUN` from A, and exports it in B's NAMESPACE. The
> package name of A may be obtained from
> environmentName(environment(FUN)). At the moment, since R CMD check
> will warn against the missing documentation of `FUN` in B, I have to
> copy FUN.Rd from A to B in this case, which seems to be inefficient
> and not a best way to maintain. Did I miss anything in the R-exts
> manual?
>
> Regards,
> Yihui
> --
> Yihui Xie <xieyihui at gmail.com>
> Web: http://yihui.name
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Winston Chang <winstonchang1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Martyn Plummer <plummerm at iarc.fr> wrote:
>>
>>>  Export filter in the NAMESPACE file *without copying it* in the R source
>>> code.
>>>
>>>
>> Ah, it works! Thank you!
>>