[Rd] formals() adds 0 to complex function arguments
pdalgd at gmail.com
Mon Jan 20 17:21:07 CET 2014
On 20 Jan 2014, at 00:00 , Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Someone might want to fix this by implementing a full syntax for complex constants, but meanwhile, I think a passable workaround could be
>> That might be nice to do. Not sure if it's easy or hard...
> I think it's hard. After seeing the 1, when the parser gets a "+", it's not clear whether you're in the middle of a complex number or some other kind of sum. And since users can redefine "+", it could be a really different kind, even if it's followed by 2i.
Yes. That's what I suspected; you may need to actually change the syntax.
I was thinking something like a=1C+2i, or even more radically a=_Const_(1+2i) with the idea of evaluating the contents of _Const_() at parse time or maybe rather function definition time.
The latter idea might solve some other issues where R structures can't be defined as constants (pretty much any nonscalar vector, for instance), and the associated issues with non-reversibility of deparse().
But as you say, it's likely to be hard.
Peter Dalgaard, Professor
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com
More information about the R-devel