[Rd] inconsolata font for building vignettes with R-devel

Ben Bolker bbolker at gmail.com
Sat Sep 24 00:27:45 CEST 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/23/2011 06:25 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> 
> On 23 September 2011 at 18:03, Ben Bolker wrote:
> |   Just to save someone else a few seconds of googling: when you try to R
> | CMD check with recent versions of R-devel and you get
> | 
> | * checking PDF version of manual ... WARNING
> | LaTeX errors when creating PDF version.
> | This typically indicates Rd problems.
> | LaTeX errors found:
> | ! LaTeX Error: File `inconsolata.sty' not found.
> | 
> |  the Debian/Ubuntu solution is:
> | 
> | sudo apt-get install texlive-fonts-extra
> 
> Odd.  I just built the R 2.13.2 release candidate this morning.  My
> Build-Depends list is 
> 
>    Build-Depends: gcc (>= 4:4.1.0), g++ (>= 4:4.1.0), gfortran (>= 4:4.1.0),
>      libblas-dev, liblapack-dev (>= 3.1.1), tcl8.5-dev, tk8.5-dev, bison,
>      groff-base, libncurses5-dev, libreadline-dev, debhelper (>= 7.2.3),
>      texi2html, texinfo (>= 4.1-2), libbz2-dev, liblzma-dev, libpcre3-dev,
>      xdg-utils, zlib1g-dev, libpng12-dev, libjpeg-dev, libx11-dev, libxt-dev,
>      x11proto-core-dev, libpango1.0-dev, libcairo2-dev, libtiff4-dev, xvfb,
>      xauth, xfonts-base, texlive-base, texlive-latex-base,
>      texlive-generic-recommended, texlive-fonts-recommended,
>      texlive-extra-utils, texlive-latex-recommended, texlive-latex-extra,
>      texinfo, texi2html, openjdk-6-jdk [!arm !hppa !kfreebsd-i386
>      !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386 !mips] 
> 
> which has texlive-fonts-recommended but t-f-extra as you suggest. Seems not
> to have any side effects:
> 
> edd at max:~$ wc -l src/debian/build-logs/r-base_2.13.2~20110922-1.log 
> 17147 src/debian/build-logs/r-base_2.13.2~20110922-1.log
> edd at max:~$ 
> 
> So is there a safe fallback or not?  Should I install texlive-fonts-extra too
> when building?
> 
> Dirk

  I'm on 10.04 LTS which might have something to do with it ... maybe
texlive-latex-recommended is a different/older version with less stuff
in it?  (Maybe ????)



> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOfQfgAAoJED2whTVMEyK9GB0H/2gy7aaGeogtbwT6xDJEqV2G
qDeS8/xDS4gXlXm1mXucLcgVyz9GwpT75YfKdGVJTH5m9EDXyeM13I+SyC87VL37
T/g9rIGo4PyqqqipGKO7MRKd799igr6uv+Ua/mzkyWkNptyHZNVwxSgk35GQD6cp
l+F6h0a4L6l11dR+HwjtfyRXC8io+/aRF1WlEmfZjwr5P8/soQTDpawi0SSpWrCa
Rh32fHE0X2RKiXevrN0yscSRTD7PR3ZdEcqThiKK/6xxF/HM6AW0CD+xVbxpoAz8
3ftXpKCik7z/23tzbskVjuASvvdYWwFGSQiULFS+xOm/aCLrjt/W2RmWlw4Y2C4=
=jpMf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the R-devel mailing list