[Rd] difficulty with 'parallel' in building r57032 -- missing Makefile?

Ben Bolker bbolker at gmail.com
Thu Sep 15 10:54:57 CEST 2011


On 11-09-20 09:29 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
> 
> On Sep 20, 2011, at 20:57 , Ben Bolker wrote:
> 
>> 
>> From SVN revision 57032, with configuration
>> 
>> R is now configured for i686-pc-linux-gnu
>> 
>> Source directory:          . Installation directory:    /usr/local
>> 
>> C compiler:                gcc -std=gnu99  -g -O2 Fortran 77
>> compiler:       gfortran  -g -O2
>> 
>> C++ compiler:              g++  -g -O2 Fortran 90/95 compiler:
>> gfortran -g -O2 Obj-C compiler:
>> 
>> Interfaces supported:      X11 External libraries:        readline 
>> Additional capabilities:   PNG, JPEG, NLS, cairo Options enabled:
>> shared BLAS, R profiling, Java
>> 
>> Recommended packages:      yes
>> 
>> 
>> having run tools/rsync-recommended, I get stuck at:
>> 
>> 
>> make[3]: Entering directory 
>> `/mnt/hgfs/bolker/Documents/R/r-devel/src/library/parallel' 
>> make[3]: *** No rule to make target `all'.  Stop. make[3]: Leaving
>> directory 
>> `/mnt/hgfs/bolker/Documents/R/r-devel/src/library/parallel' 
>> make[2]: *** [R] Error 1
>> 
>> I don't know quite enough about configure/make/etc. to know what's 
>> going wrong here, but it seems that one symptom is that "Makefile"
>> does not exist/is not built in src/library/parallel ... Makefile.in
>> and Makefile.win  in my fumbling way, I looked through configure, 
>> configure.ac, etc., comparing what is done with the "splines"
>> package, and no glaring differences leap out at me -- so I'm
>> stumped.
>> 
>> If I do ./configure --without-parallel; make , it works.
>> 
>> 
>> If I'm being an idiot please be gentle ...
> 
> Hmm, did you do this as a squeaky-clean build? I think I saw
> something like that on OSX and it disappeared after "make distclean"
> and reconfiguration.
> 
> It's fairly common that a clean build is required after changes to
> the directory structure or similar changes to the build structure.
> Every once in a while, it is just not worth the trouble to ensure
> that you can keep previously built intermediate files.
> 
> Also, try not building in the source directory. It's much easier to
> clean up if build in a separate build directory.
> 
> 

  Yes, thank you, that seems to have done the trick.

  Ben Bolker



More information about the R-devel mailing list