[Rd] Please explain your workflow from R code -> package -> R code -> package
Timothée Carayol
timothee.carayol at gmail.com
Tue Sep 13 20:16:59 CEST 2011
Hi--
I guess I'm a bit late to the party. I enjoyed this thread immensely,
and it helped me discover roxygen2, in what I predict to be the
beginning of a beautiful friendship.
I wrote a couple of wrappers over the last few days which are making
my workflow easier. I code on a computer but run my computations on
several different boxes, meaning that I need a simple way (ideally
one-liner) to deploy the code on each box. So I have a couple of
wrapper functions, which I am happy to share with you.
1) RPush: this bash function roxygenizes, commits and pushes a package
to a git repo. It assumes that your packages are all in a folder, the
path to which is given by the environment variable $RPACK. For example
$RPACK/Package1 and $RPACK/Package2.)
function RPush {
cd $RPACK/$1
R --quiet --vanilla --slave <<EOF
suppressMessages(library(roxygen2))
roxygenize("./")
EOF
git add ./
git commit -am "$2"
git push
cd - > /dev/null
}
The syntax is
RPush <package name> 'commit message'
2) GitInstall is an R function somewhat inspired by Hadley Wickham's
Intall_Github, except that it is not bound to Github and can (I think)
be used with any git server.
GitInstall <- function(
repo,
branch = "HEAD",
remote="git at yougitserver:yourrepo"
) {
repo <- as.character(substitute(repo))
tartf <- tempfile()
pkgtd <- tempfile()
dir.create(pkgtd)
on.exit(unlink(c(tartf, pkgtd)))
system(
paste(
"git archive --format=tar --remote=",
remote, repo,
" ", branch, "> ",
tartf,
sep=""
))
message("Attempting to install ", repo, " from ", remote, ".")
system(paste(
"tar -xf",
tartf,
"-C",
pkgtd
))
install.packages(pkgtd, repo=NULL, type="source")
}
You can then wrap it in a bash function such as
function RInstall {
sudo R --quiet --slave <<EOF
Package1::GitInstall($1)
EOF
}
(where it is assumed that you put the GitInstall function in Package1)
So that to update a package and deploy it to a remote machine you just
need to type:
- on the local machine: RPush Package1 'commit message'
- on the remote machine: RInstall Package1
I don't think it gets much lazier than that!
Hope it helps, though I am sure this code is not super clean and may
break for other people..
Timothee
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:48 AM, <Mark.Bravington at csiro.au> wrote:
> I create & maintain all my packages using the 'mvbutils' package. Documentation in plain-text format (not Rd) is stored along with each function definition--- so when you edit your function, its doco is right there too, and it looks like proper documentation, not code-comments or quasi-Latex. The entire package source tree, including the Rd files, is created automatically by the 'preinstall' function, after which you can then R-BUILD the package as usual. However, with 'mvbutils' you only need R-BUILD when you want a distribution version for others. Normal maintenance doesn't require R-BUILD; you can add/remove/edit functions, documentation, and data to the package on-the-fly while it is loaded, with no need to unload/uninstall/rebuild/reload.
>
> It works with compiled code, too. My own way of working with compiled code is a bit different to most other people's, but colleagues who use more traditional routes have also successfully used 'mvbutils' to build and maintain their packages.
>
> In the spirit of several other replies-- I spent months developing this stuff and getting it to run smoothly, precisely because I'm lazy and have a limited memory...
>
> HTH (though whether "yet another approach is..." will actually help you, I'm not sure)
>
> Mark
>
>
> Mark Bravington
> CSIRO CMIS
> Marine Lab
> Hobart
> Australia
> ________________________________________
> From: r-devel-bounces at r-project.org [r-devel-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Paul Johnson [pauljohn32 at gmail.com]
> Sent: 10 September 2011 02:38
> To: r-devel at stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: [Rd] Please explain your workflow from R code -> package -> R code -> package
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm asking another one of those questions that would be obvious if I
> could watch your work while you do it.
>
> I'm having trouble understanding the workflow of code and package maintenance.
>
> Stage 1. Make some R functions in a folder. This is in a Subversion repo
>
> R/trunk/myproject
>
> Stage 2. Make a package:
>
> After the package.skeleton, and R check, I have a new folder with the
> project in it,
>
> R/trunk/myproject/mypackage
> DESCRIPTION
> man
> R
>
> I to into the man folder and manually edit the Rd files. I don't
> change anything in the R folder because I think it is OK so far.
>
> And eventually I end up with a tarball mypackage_1.0.tar.gz.
>
> Stage 3. How to make the round trip? I add more R code, and
> re-generate a package.
>
> package.skeleton obliterates the help files I've already edited.
>
> So keeping the R code in sync with the documentation appears to be a hassle.
>
> In other languages, I've seen to write the documentation inside the
> code files and then post-process to make the documentation. Is there
> a similar thing for R, to unify the R code development and
> documentation/package-making process?
>
> pj
>
> --
> Paul E. Johnson
> Professor, Political Science
> 1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504
> University of Kansas
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
More information about the R-devel
mailing list