[Rd] R CMD <custom>?
murdoch.duncan at gmail.com
Mon Nov 28 23:26:27 CET 2011
On 11-11-28 3:19 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>> That does seem to mix up namespaces quite a bit.
> That was just a proposal - equally
> R CMD mypackage::mycommand
> could just run
> but then passing argument might get a bit confusing.
>> But what does it get you
>> that "Rscript -e" doesn't already give you? You can set up your package so
>> R CMD mypackage::mycommand
>> executes a function, using delayedAssign or some of the more exotic features
>> (like external pointers and finalizers).
> Because you have to specify the path to that package?
Sorry, I was in a rush and typed the wrong thing. I meant to type
Rscript -e mypackage::mycommand
which needs no path.
R CMD roxygen2
> is much easier to type, remember and is portable, compared to
> ~/R/roxygen2/something.r. It also makes R CMD scripts extensible by
> packages in a consistent manner.
"Easier to type" is not a good argument, since any reasonable command
line shell would allow you to abbreviate whatever you wanted. "rox" is
easier to type than R CMD roxygen2, and is easy enough to make happen.
More information about the R-devel