[Rd] NAMESPACE file generation issue R 2.14.0 on Debian Squeeze
ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
Tue Nov 8 17:30:24 CET 2011
On 08.11.2011 17:04, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> 2011/11/8 Uwe Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>:
>> On 08.11.2011 16:31, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>> 2011/11/8 Uwe Ligges<ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>:
>>>> I think many people like to help, but we cannot:
>>>> You say you are under R-2.14.0 and whn you R CMD INSTALL a package with
>>>> version of R, it does not have a NAMESPACE in the end?
>>>> - your R installation is broken or
>>>> - you are looking into a library where you have old versios of the
>>>> - you belive you are using R-2.14.0 but you are actually using an older
>>> This is even reproduced on CRAN. All platforms work except one:
>> No, that one is completely unrelated (and already solved, but not yet synced
>> to CRAN master) to the original question you have removed in your reply.
> OK. One would have thought that the checks on CRAN would be
> consistent with the package pages which link to them.
I only see consistent information on that page.
And it should be like that within few hours after a change. Syncing the
logs from at least 4 different sources and regenerating the overview
page has to happen sometime and you can always visit between two updates
so you may have seen an inconsistency that is no longer there.
> The summary
> table at check_results_sqldf.html does not actually give the version
> that is being tested
It does, that's what the "Version" column contains. And the R version is
also reported in the first column. You see check fro R-devel, R-release
> so its only by clicking each of the links on the
> summary table that one would uncover this inconsistency.
> Regarding quoting, the mail server seems to reject posts from gmail
> for all sorts of unknown reasons and quoting large posts very well
> might be one of them so one has to be extremely careful. For a while
> (this is some time ago) I was unable to post at all but over time
> learned that if I was sure to bottom rather than top post and not
> quote too much then it would get through.
More information about the R-devel