[Rd] Reference Classes: (Was: Accessing methods via [[...]], bug?)
jmc at r-project.org
Wed May 4 18:35:24 CEST 2011
On 5/4/11 9:24 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>>> Are you familiar with "Concepts, Techniques, and Models of Computer
>>> Programming" by van Roy and Haridi? That's what really helped me to
>>> understand the strengths and weaknesses of the various styles of
>> Thanks, I wasn't. Yes, interesting similar distinction between functional
>> and "type" decomposition. An important associated aspect for us is the
>> distinction between reference objects and "ordinary" R objects, not AFAICS
>> conveyed by their more abstract treatment.
> Another discussion I found useful was in SICP:
> I really like the metaphor of method dispatch as a table with types in
> the columns and operations in the rows - then you can think of generic
> functions oo as being row-based, and class based oo as column-based.
Except that functional method dispatch with multiple dispatch is
dispatched on a K-tple of classes if the generic function has K
arguments in its signature.
This is not a trivial distinction because it means that a method can
depend on more than one class definition, so it's not just a matter of
distributing the same information in different ways, but a fundamentally
more complicated structure for functional OOP (for better and/or for worse).
More information about the R-devel