[Rd] requesting a mentor for R development
Ben Bolker
bbolker at gmail.com
Tue Jun 21 16:19:15 CEST 2011
Paul Johnson <pauljohn32 <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> I'd like to learn the process of revising R functions & packages and
> then submitting proposed patches to the R Core team. Would someone be
> willing to mentor me through one example?
I don't know about mentoring, but I'll give my two cents (some
specific and some general thoughts, and some of my own questions).
> For starters, consider an example. I'd like to revise the t.test
> function to return the stderr value to the user. We only need to
> change the "rval" in the third-from-the end line of
> stats:::t.test.default.
>
> Change this:
>
> rval <- list(statistic = tstat, parameter = df, p.value = pval,
> conf.int = cint, estimate = estimate, null.value = mu,
> alternative = alternative, method = method, data.name = dname)
> class(rval) <- "htest"
> return(rval)
>
> To this:
>
> rval <- list(statistic = tstat, parameter = df, stderr=stderr, p.value = pval,
> conf.int = cint, estimate = estimate, null.value = mu,
> alternative = alternative, method = method, data.name = dname)
> class(rval) <- "htest"
> return(rval)
>
> Here is where I need help.
>
> 1. What other changes in the R code & documents would be required for
> consistency?
You would certainly want to modify the corresponding manual page.
There is an issue with fitting this specific change into the existing
R framework. 't.test' returns an object of class 'htest', which is
printed using 'stats:::print.htest'. I haven't actually tried it,
but it looks to me as though print.htest (which is intended to
be a generic class for statistical test -- maybe h stands for
"hypothesis", I don't know) will simply ignore "stderr" or
any other non-default components of an 'htest' object.
There is a '...' argument to 'print.htest', but it functions
to pass options to print() for the estimate and the null values.
I haven't been able to find any specific documentation about
htest. print.htest() is used for a wide range of tests (in the
stats package and many contributed packages), so obviously it
would be bad to make non-backward-compatible changes. I think
it might be best to modify print.htest() so it looked
for any additional/non-standard components of the object and
printed them after all the other output (they would need to
have reasonable labels incorporated somehow too).
>
> 2. How does R Core Team expect/accept patches?
> I do understand a bit about SVN and CVS. I think I could mark this up
> and make a diff, but I'm uncertain about the details.
I think that patches via "svn diff" against the latest SVN are
preferred. The only routes I know for submission are (1) sending
patch files to R-devel or (2) submitting them to the R bugs system
as a "wishlist" item. I don't know which is preferred.
> 3. How would I best prepare a suggestion like this so as to get it
> accepted into R?
I think the accepted method (although I don't know whether this
is documented anywhere) is to do what you have done, submitting a
"request for discussion" on r-devel, getting it discussed, posting
patches for comment, and hoping for the best.
More information about the R-devel
mailing list