[Rd] doc bug in ?residuals.gls

[Prof Brian Ripley]

On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Ben Bolker wrote:

>
> Under the description of the 'type' argument, ?residuals.gls says
> 'Defaults to ‘"pearson"’.'
>
> But residuals.gls starts
>
> residuals.gls <-
> function(object, type = c("response", "pearson", "normalized"), ...)
> {
> type <- match.arg(type)
>
> ...
>
> which sure looks to me like it defaults to "response", not "pearson"
> (and it behaves that way in tests).
>
> It would seem to make more sense to change the documentation rather than
> the code
> since anyone who looked at the docs would have been confused already,
> whereas someone who had
> been happily using the code without looking at the docs would see a
> sudden change in the results ...
>
> This is in nlme 3.1-96, from a fresh tools/rsync-recommended. Sending it
> to r-devel for comment because r-core is listed as the maintainer.

Whereas bug reports should be sent to the maintainer or (for packages 
maintained by R-core) R-bugs.  The SVN version of nlme has
BugReports: http://bugs.r-project.org
since reports here are easily overlooked.

I've changed the SVN sources, but most likely a new release of nlme 
will be made only when something substantive is changed.

-- 
Brian D. Ripley,                  ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics,  http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford,             Tel:  +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road,                     +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK                Fax:  +44 1865 272595