[Rd] R 2.12.0 problems with Windows XP 32-bit binary installer
Prof Brian Ripley
ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Mon Oct 18 08:19:39 CEST 2010
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Hodgess, Erin wrote:
> I found the Rgui.exe under directory R\R-2.12.0\bin\i386.
Please read the CHANGES file: this is the first item for 2.12.0.
I don't believe it is related to Bill's problem. The latter looks
like a package installed for R < 2.12.0 (also covered in the first
item of CHANGES), but without the exact message we cannot be sure.
(For the record, Mac OS X has 'fat' binaries, but R does not use them
for compiled code in packages - it used subdirectories just as on
> Erin M. Hodgess, PhD
> Associate Professor
> Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences
> University of Houston - Downtown
> mailto: hodgesse at uhd.edu
> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.duncan at gmail.com]
> Sent: Sun 10/17/2010 7:53 PM
> To: Bill.Venables at csiro.au
> Cc: Hodgess, Erin; r-devel at r-project.org
> Subject: Re: R 2.12.0 problems with Windows XP 32-bit binary installer
> Bill.Venables at csiro.au wrote:
>> I am having a problem with the installed R 2.12.0 on 32-bit Windows XP machine using the binary version.
>> The installer I am using is R-2.12.0-win.exe . The problem I have
>> is that some of my installed packages will not load, in particular
>> PolynomF, which has a pre-compiled .dll. Other packages such as
>> SOAR, which is pure R, attach and work without a hitch.
>> The error message I am getting when trying to load PolynomF is a
>> question whether or not the package has been compiled for the
>> present architecture. (This package works without a hitch on
>> R-2.11.1, for example.)
>> Is there any significance in the name of the installer now
>> including just "win" rather than "win32", as it was in the last
>> Is it the case that all packages will have to be re-built for the
>> present release?
> Generally packages do need to be rebuilt for new versions of R (other
> than patch releases, where only the last digit changes). R 2.12.0
> supports both 32 bit and 64 bit Windows in the same installation, and
> since Windows doesn't have MacOS-like "universal" binaries, that means
> binaries need to be put in the right place. Generally that's an i386
> subdirectory for 32 bit, and an x64 directory for 64 bit.
> I don't know why a 32 bit DLL wouldn't work with 32 bit R 2.12.0, but if
> it was installed for 2.11.1, it might not be in the right place.
> Duncan Murdoch
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
More information about the R-devel