[Rd] proposed change to 'sample'
kjetilbrinchmannhalvorsen at gmail.com
Tue Jun 22 03:15:47 CEST 2010
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Peter Dalgaard <pdalgd at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hadley Wickham wrote:
>>> I would be more inclined to make sampling from a vector the normal case,
>>> and default x to say 1:max(n, size), forcing users to say sample(n=5) if
>>> sampling from x=1:5 is desired. This could be a manageable change; the
>>> deprecation sequence is a bit painful to think through, though.
>> Don't we already have sample.int for that case?
> For the 2nd case, yes, but I was aiming at getting sample(x) ==
> x[sample.int(length(x))] also in the length 1 case, removing the
> ambiguity. This would obviously break some code, but I'd expect not all
> that much. However, it cannot be changed in one go, we'd need to go
> through a sequence where we (e.g.)
> 1. warn about length(x)==1
> 2. say that length(x)==1 is deprecated
> 3. have length(x)==1 throw an error
> 4. wait....
> 5. give length(x)==1 a new meaning
Please implement this sequence!
> Peter Dalgaard
> Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
> Phone: (+45)38153501
> Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
More information about the R-devel