[Rd] warning from install.packages()
Martin Maechler
maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch
Thu Jun 3 10:05:27 CEST 2010
>>>>> "BB" == Ben Bolker <bolker at ufl.edu>
>>>>> on Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:45:18 -0400 writes:
BB> Michael Dewey wrote:
>> At 13:40 01/06/2010, Ben Bolker wrote:
>>
>>>> On 25/05/10 23:25 PM, "Ben Bolker" <bolker <at> ufl.edu> wrote:
>>>> Just curious: is there a particular reason why install.packages()
>>>> gives a warning in normal use when 'lib' is not specified (e.g. argument
>>>> 'lib' is missing: using '/usr/local/lib/R/site-library' )?
>>
>> As I see it R is saying 'I am doing what you told
>> me, but just in case I am checking whether that
>> was what you really wanted'. Note that you do not
>> get a warning if there was only one place R could
>> put it. I would certainly vote for a message if
>> people are getting unnecessarily alarmed by the warning.
BB> But this seems so different from R's general philosophy/behavior
BB> (inherited from Unix?) that a function that gets correct input and
BB> executes without error returns silently ...
That's correct.
Note however that installing a package is not just a thing
happening in your R session.
It will affect all your future R sessions, and possibly even
other users' who have the same .libPaths()[1]
{e.g. the group here does share it}.
I'd agree to not put a warning but I'd definitely want a message
aka "note" to the user.
The *wording* of that note should not be alarming at all, I
agree, just a note to the user.
Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
More information about the R-devel
mailing list