[Rd] buglet in is.na?
Duncan Murdoch
murdoch at stats.uwo.ca
Wed Sep 30 20:41:08 CEST 2009
On 9/30/2009 2:29 PM, Nicholas Lewin-Koh wrote:
> Hi
> the following example I think demonstrates the inconsistency
>> f<-function(x) x
>> length(f)
> [1] 1
>> is.na(f)
> [1] FALSE
> Warning message:
> In is.na(f) : is.na() applied to non-(list or vector) of type 'closure'
As the error message says, closures aren't vectors. However, they do
have a length.
> The documentation states:
> Arguments
> x an R object to be tested.
> value a suitable index vector for use with x.
>
> And nowhere in the details was it implied (to me anyway) that x could
> not be a function
> or anything else in R for that matter. Did I miss something?
This might be an omission from the docs, but it did say pretty clearly
in the warning message that x needs to be a vector. So it's not a bug.
The source for the docs is in
https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/library/base/man/NA.rd
If you can think of a way to make it clearer, and you think this is the
sort of error someone would not understand given the warning message,
please submit a patch.
Duncan Murdoch
More information about the R-devel
mailing list