[Rd] cannot build R-devel (>= r49747)
Romain Francois
romain.francois at dbmail.com
Tue Sep 22 09:33:10 CEST 2009
On 09/22/2009 09:17 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
>
> Romain Francois wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've tried several times yesterday to build R-devel and I consistently
>> get this error when I "make" :
>>
>> mkdir -p -- ../../../library/base/R
>> make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/R-devel/src/library/profile'
>> make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/R-devel/src/library/base'
>> building package 'base'
>> make[4]: Entering directory `/tmp/R-devel/src/library/base'
>> mkdir -p -- ../../../library/base/demo
>> mkdir -p -- ../../../library/base/po
>> make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/R-devel/src/library/base'
>> Error: unprotect_ptr: pointer not found
>> Execution halted
>> make[3]: *** [all] Error 1
>> make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/R-devel/src/library/base'
>> make[2]: *** [R] Error 1
>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/R-devel/src/library'
>> make[1]: *** [R] Error 1
>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/R-devel/src'
>> make: *** [R] Error 1
>>
>>
>> I tried this morning to step down and I believe this has been
>> introduced by rev 49747:
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r49747 | murdoch | 2009-09-18 14:10:55 -0400 (Fri, 18 Sep 2009) | 1 line
>> Changed paths:
>> M /trunk/src/include/Defn.h
>> M /trunk/src/include/Parse.h
>> M /trunk/src/main/gram.c
>> M /trunk/src/main/gram.y
>> M /trunk/src/main/main.c
>> M /trunk/src/main/memory.c
>>
>> Allow parsing in the middle of a REPL on a file, without messing up
>> the source record for the file.
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ... which makes sense since it looks like a parser issue.
>>
>> I can build revision 49746.
>>
>> This is a fedora 11 :
>>
>> $ uname -a
>> Linux santorini 2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Aug 24
>> 17:16:21 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>>
>> I'm not sure what I can do to help fixing this. Can someone else with
>> a fedora replicate this ?
>>
>> Romain
>>
>
> This could be pretty serious.
>
> unprotect_ptr is used where the usual PROTECT/UNPROTECT mechanisms don't
> work because things do not follow strict stack discipline. The main spot
> is when the parser uses lookahead to distinguish different constructs.
Yes. This makes sense since rev 49747 was a fix to another bug when R
reenters the parser. See the thread :
"[Rd] 2.10.0 Under development (unstable) (2009-09-15 r49711) just built
segfaults on Debian Squeeze"
> I don't think I have ever seen it fail like that, but a possible reason
> could be that the wrong pointer got removed from the protection stack.
> Or memory corruption in the stack itself of course. A bit odd if the
> former sort of bug should be unportable, though.
>
> It is not happening for me on 32bit fedora 9.
Thanks for this. I'll digg a little deeper
> It could be useful if you could drill a little further down to see
> exactly how R is invoked at the failure, incl content input file(s), and
> maybe redo the run with debugging turned on so that we can see who is
> trying to unprotect what.
--
Romain Francois
Professional R Enthusiast
+33(0) 6 28 91 30 30
http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr
|- http://tr.im/yw8E : New R package : sos
|- http://tr.im/y8y0 : search the graph gallery from R
`- http://tr.im/y8wY : new R package : ant
More information about the R-devel
mailing list