On 29/11/2009 1:39 PM, Ben Bolker wrote: > 1. footnote 5, p. 52: "there is only a fine distinction between \dots > and \dots" > > I should hope so :-) (from context, I think one of these should be > \ldots instead) > > 2. under "\keyword{key}", p. 45: "are not part of the packages' API." > Should that be "package's" ? Thanks, I'll fix these. Duncan Murdoch