[Rd] [R] sprintf() question
Ei-ji Nakama
nakama at ki.rim.or.jp
Mon May 18 08:40:55 CEST 2009
Hi
The result of Windows is clearly strange.
================ my Linux machine = good =======================
> sessionInfo()
R version 2.9.0 (2009-04-17)
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
locale:
LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.EUC-JP;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=ja_JP.EUC-JP;LC_COLLATE=ja_JP.EUC-JP;
LC_MONETARY=C;LC_MESSAGES=ja_JP.EUC-JP;LC_PAPER=ja_JP.EUC-JP;LC_NAME=C;LC_ADDRES
S=C;LC_TELEPHONE=C;LC_MEASUREMENT=ja_JP.EUC-JP;LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
> sprintf("%a",1:8)
[1] "0x1p+0" "0x1p+1" "0x1.8p+1" "0x1p+2" "0x1.4p+2" "0x1.8p+2" "0x1.cp+2"
[8] "0x1p+3"
================ my Windows machine = OMG ======================
> sessionInfo()
R version 2.9.0 (2009-04-17)
i386-pc-mingw32
locale:
LC_COLLATE=Japanese_Japan.932;LC_CTYPE=Japanese_Japan.932;LC_MONETARY=Japanese_Japan.932;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=Japanese_Japan.932
attached base packages:
[1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
> sprintf("%a",1:8)
[1] "0x1p+0" "0x1" "0x1.8"
"0x1p+4294967294"
[5] "0x1.4p+4294967294" "0x1.8p+4294967294" "0x1.cp+4294967294"
"0x1p+4294967293"
The result improved when I changed handling of uExponent as follows
http://prs.ism.ac.jp/~nakama/working/sprintf_format_a.patch
2009/5/18 Daniel Nordlund <djnordlund at verizon.net>:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ted Harding [mailto:Ted.Harding at manchester.ac.uk]
>> Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 3:32 PM
>> To: Daniel Nordlund
>> Cc: r-help at r-project.org
>> Subject: RE: [R] sprintf() question
>>
>> On 17-May-09 22:03:19, Daniel Nordlund wrote:
>> > When I type the following, I get results different from what I
>> > expected.
>> >
>> >> sprintf('%a',3)
>> > [1] "0x1.8"
>> >
>> > Shouldn't the result be
>> >
>> > [1] "0x1.8p+2"
>>
>> Well, not "p+2" but "p+1"
>> (0x1.8 = 1.1000[2] ; *2 = 11.000[2] = 3[10]) ;
>> however, I get:
>>
>> sprintf('%a',3)
>> # [1] "0x1.8p+1"
>>
>> which is indeed correct.
>>
>> R version 2.9.0 (2009-04-17) ## Same as yours
>> platform i486-pc-linux-gnu ## Different from yours ...
>>
>> which perhaps suggests that there may be a mis-compilation in the
>> Windows version.
>>
>> Ted.
>>
>> > I read through the help ?sprintf and didn't find anything
>> that changed
>> > my expectation. What am I misunderstanding? I am using
>> R-2.9.0 binary
>> > from CRAN on Windows XP Pro, and my session info is
>> >
>> >
>> >> sessionInfo()
>> > R version 2.9.0 (2009-04-17)
>> > i386-pc-mingw32
>> >
>> > locale:
>> > LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252;LC_CTYPE=English_United
>> > States.1252;LC_MONETARY=English_United
>> > States.1252;LC_NUMERIC=C;LC_TIME=English_United States.1252
>> >
>> > attached base packages:
>> > [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets
>> methods base
>> >>
>> >
>> > Thanks for any enlightenment.
>> >
>
> Thanks Ted!
>
> Enlightenment is what I asked for, and it is what I got. I was having a
> senior moment I guess. I was picturing 8 as binary 0100, when obviously it
> is binary 1000. So yes, the required power of 2 is 1, and it is fine with
> me that Windows implementation does not display it. Thanks again.
>
> Dan
>
> Daniel Nordlund
> Bothell, WA USA
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
>
>
--
EI-JI Nakama <nakama (a) ki.rim.or.jp>
"\u4e2d\u9593\u6804\u6cbb" <nakama (a) ki.rim.or.jp>
More information about the R-devel
mailing list