[Rd] Problem building (binary) packages for Windows / resolved
peter.ruckdeschel at web.de
Fri May 15 16:34:46 CEST 2009
thanks for your quick answer.
>> Searching the help archives, I found a posting by Uwe Ligges,
>> saying that
>> R CMD INSTALL --build
>> was preferable to
>> R CMD build --binary
>> --- in which respect? Would this avoid the error message?
> The main benefit is that links between help pages will be more likely
> to be set correctly.
Thank you for clarifying this; in fact
R CMD INSTALL --build
produced the same problem for me (see below).
>> Actually, the corresponding zip-file containes
>> a second DESCRIPTION file in the top folder, like a
>> bundle, which I think is the culpit, and after
>> deleting this installation worked out fine.
> You can't have two files with the same name in the same folder in
Yes, but this is not what happened:
The zip file produced by either
R CMD build --binary or R CMD INSTALL --build
had the following folder structure
(below the top folder, "+" indicating subfolder)
The two DESCRIPTION files were in different folders:
the first one in the top folder (at the wrong place), the second
one in the <pkgname> folder (at the right place).
Both DESCRIPTION files were identical.
> I use Rcmd INSTALL --build most of the time and have never seen your
so did I....
> I just tried Rcmd build --binary and the file installed okay.
> Can you give a recipe to reproduce the error?
In fact --- as Brian Ripley pointed out in another
reply --- this was a transient effect of R-2.10.0dev between
April 26 (my "old" devel version) and today.
It appeared for both
R CMD build --binary mypkg
R CMD INSTALL --build mypkg
The problem did not happen for an older
devel version ---
R version 2.9.0 Under development (unstable) (2009-02-18 r47956)
So apologies for stirring you up with something that had been
fixed in the mean-time already.
More information about the R-devel