[Rd] patch for 'merge' docs

Roger D. Peng rpeng at jhsph.edu
Mon Mar 9 13:17:49 CET 2009


Hmm, I see what you mean, and I'd be willing to accept that logic if I
could find a single other instance in the R documentation where that
shorthand was used. But I suppose this might be the only instance
where such a shorthand is necessary.

-roger

On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen
<khansen at stat.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> Roger
>
> (I think) L is shorthand for some logical value, ie. TRUE or FALSE. That has
> always been pretty clear to me. Your patch was stripped.
>
> Kasper
>
> On Mar 8, 2009, at 18:20 , Roger D. Peng wrote:
>
>> I've never quite understood the documentation for the 'all' argument
>> to 'merge'. I'm pretty sure using 'all = L' doesn't work but I'm open
>> to correction here. In any event, I've attached a patch.
>>
>> -roger
>>
>> --
>> Roger D. Peng  |  http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~rpeng/
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>



-- 
Roger D. Peng  |  http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~rpeng/



More information about the R-devel mailing list