[Rd] overwriting '<-' and infinite recursions
tplate at acm.org
Sat Jan 24 00:09:48 CET 2009
I wonder if you might be able to make use of R's "active bindings."
These enable you to set things up so that a user definable function is
called when an assignment is made or when a value is accessed. It's
sort of like overriding assignment for a particular variable, but you
don't need to mess with the definition of assignment.
to see the related functions. The help page for makeActiveBinding has a
-- Tony Plte
Yi Zhang wrote:
> Thanks, Luke. I would certainly be very happy to see any non-intrusive
> solution. The problem I'm dealing with is: I'm creating a new class
> which references some external resource (file or database) and I want
> to make the reference counting work. An example (-> means references):
> Initially we have symbol a -> object oa of my class -> file fa.
> Suppose then R code "b<-a" is executed. With no modification to the
> '<-' function, R would make another symbol b and bind it to oa.
> Imagine next "b<-0" is executed. Here comes the trouble: R only
> knows to duplicate oa to another ob; the modification will be done to
> the underlying shared file fa. Of course, I have necessary code for
> overriding "[<-" and make that modification. The whole thing is
> because I'm not aware of any sharing of the external resource at the R
> level. That's the motivation for me to
> overwrite '<-' in the first place. Any potential alternative solutions?
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:25 PM, <luke at stat.uiowa.edu> wrote:
>> While it _may_ be possible to make this work in current R (I don't
>> know if it is) this is a Really Bad Idea as it will affect every other
>> piece of R code run on the system. It also may not work at all in
>> future versions of R (assignment is sufficiently core functionality
>> that it may not be implemented via a function at all in some
>> circumstances). Locked bindings are locked for a reason: we as
>> developers can assume that their values are what we intend them to be.
>> If those values are changed then that assumption fails and some things
>> may stop working.
>> If you explain what your needs are someone on the list can probably
>> help you find a more effective and less intrusive way of doing it.
>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Yi Zhang wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>> I'm having a problem when overwriting the '<-' function and was told
>>> I'd better post it here for help. The reason why I need to overwrite
>>> it is complicated and not easy to tell in a few words; but this seems
>>> the only clean option other than hacking R's core source code. My code
>>> looks like:
>>> # in .onLoad of a package; or if you want to test, put it in a function
>>> env <- as.environment('package:base')
>>> assign('<-', newAssign, envir=env)
>>> .Internal(lockBinding(as.name('<-'), env))
>>> #not using lockBinding directly because it calls '<-'
>>> It gave me this error: Error: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite
>>> recursion / options(expressions=)?
>>> Any suggestion is appreciated!
>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>> Luke Tierney
>> Chair, Statistics and Actuarial Science
>> Ralph E. Wareham Professor of Mathematical Sciences
>> University of Iowa Phone: 319-335-3386
>> Department of Statistics and Fax: 319-335-3017
>> Actuarial Science
>> 241 Schaeffer Hall email: luke at stat.uiowa.edu
>> Iowa City, IA 52242 WWW: http://www.stat.uiowa.edu
More information about the R-devel