[Rd] particulars of importing/loading libraries
Sklyar, Oleg (London)
osklyar at maninvestments.com
Wed Jan 14 16:52:56 CET 2009
Well, this is very reasonable and this is how it should be I would say.
If it was consistent, there would be no problem as they would be easy to
nail down. However, the problem is now that if I load pack3 only (which
imports pack2 only) then as.POSIXct exported from pack1 is NOT available
for functions in pack3, but is available for calls from the global env
(see example below). It is obviously available for calls from functions
in pack2 as there it is imported directly. Although, why also
testPosix() of pack2 is then available for calls from the global env as
it was only loaded as import for pack3?
In my understanding if pack3 does not depend on pack1 directly,
functionality of pack1 should not be available anywhere apart from
functions called from pack2 as well as functions in pack2 should only be
available for calls by functions in pack3 but not in the global env...
The semantics seems to be broken here, is it not?
> library(pack3)
Loading required package: pack2
Loading required package: pack1
> testPosix() ## from pack2
[1] "2009-01-13 15:29:50 UTC"
[1] "POSIXt" "POSIXct"
[1] "2009-01-13 15:29:50 UTC"
> testPosix2()
Error in as.POSIXct.default(testPosixVal) :
do not know how to convert 'testPosixVal' to class "POSIXlt"
> as.POSIXct(pack1::testPosixVal)
[1] "2009-01-13 15:29:50 UTC"
Dr Oleg Sklyar
Research Technologist
AHL / Man Investments Ltd
+44 (0)20 7144 3107
osklyar at maninvestments.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Urbanek [mailto:simon.urbanek at r-project.org]
> Sent: 14 January 2009 15:38
> To: Sklyar, Oleg (London)
> Cc: r-devel at r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] particulars of importing/loading libraries
>
>
> On Jan 14, 2009, at 4:24 , Sklyar, Oleg (London) wrote:
>
> > Sorry Simon, you are right. I tried to recreate a problem
> that I had
> > with other packages where the packages were added to Depends but
> > made a mistake. However the problem remains if I do the following.
> >
> > Added: pack1 to Depends of pack2. Now I create pack3 with the
> > following contents: it does not import pack1 directly, nor depends
> > on it. It rather imports pack2 and depends on pack2. I then expect
> > the functionality of pack1 to be available still if I only
> load pack3.
>
>
> That is semantically not a reasonable requirement. pack3 cannot (and
> should not) assume anything about the internals of pack2. If
> it needs
> a function from pack1, it has to import it from pack1. If pack2 re-
> exported as.POSIXct then that would make it part of pack2's
> interface
> and then you're free to just depend on pack2.
>
> Cheers,
> S
>
>
>
> > But I
> > now get errors with pack3 calling the function from pack1. Does this
> > mean I need to import and depend on pack1 and methods explicitly in
> > pack3. I.e. do I have to import and depend on ALL the
> packages that
> > may
> > be in use, even if they are imported by other that I depend on and
> > import:
> >
> > ---- pack3: DESCRIPTION -----
> >
> > Package: pack3
> > Version: 0.0.1
> > Date: 12 Jan 2009
> > Title: pack1 to test S3/S4 methods compatibility
> > Author: Oleg Sklyar
> > Depends: R (>= 2.7.1), pack2
> > Maintainer: Oleg Sklyar <osklyar at maninvestments.com>
> > Description: pack3
> > LazyLoad: yes
> > License: Proprietary
> > URL: http://www.maninvestments.com
> > LazyLoad: no
> >
> > ---- pack3: NAMESPACE ------
> > import(pack2)
> > exportPattern("^[^\\.]")
> >
> > ---- pack3: posix.R ------
> > testPosix2 = function() {
> > z = as.POSIXct(testPosixVal)
> > print(z)
> > print(class(z))
> > z
> > }
> >
> > Note, that the above function is the same as in pack2, just a
> > different
> > name.
> >
> >
> > *** R 2.9.0 (svn -r 46585)
> [/share/research/R-devel/20081002/lib64/R]
> > ***
> >> library(pack3)
> > Loading required package: pack2
> > Loading required package: pack1
> >> as.POSIXct(pack1::testPosixVal)
> > [1] "2009-01-13 15:29:50 UTC"
> >> testPosxi() ## called from pack2
> > [1] "2009-01-13 15:29:50 UTC"
> > [1] "POSIXt" "POSIXct"
> > [1] "2009-01-13 15:29:50 UTC"
> >> testPosix2() ## called from pack3
> > Error in as.POSIXct.default(testPosixVal) :
> > do not know how to convert 'testPosixVal' to class "POSIXlt"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dr Oleg Sklyar
> > Research Technologist
> > AHL / Man Investments Ltd
> > +44 (0)20 7144 3107
> > osklyar at maninvestments.com
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Simon Urbanek [mailto:simon.urbanek at r-project.org]
> >> Sent: 14 January 2009 01:51
> >> To: Sklyar, Oleg (London)
> >> Cc: r-devel at r-project.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Rd] particulars of importing/loading libraries
> >>
> >> Oleg,
> >>
> >> On Jan 13, 2009, at 11:00 , Sklyar, Oleg (London) wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear List:
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for posting maybe a trivial question, but I have a basic
> >>> understanding problem. If I have say pack1 and pack2, two R
> >> packages,
> >>> and pack2 depends on and imports pack1 fully (as in the
> >> code below),
> >>> is
> >>> there a way to make all the functionality of pack1
> available for the
> >>> global and other environments (not only for the functions
> >> called from
> >>> withing pack2) by loading pack2 only? I thought if pack2
> >> depends on
> >>> and
> >>> imports pack1 and essentially reexports everything, one
> >> should get the
> >>> full functionality simply by loading pack2. This does not
> >> seem to be
> >>> the
> >>> case or I am missing something trivial in my NAMESPACE/DESCRIPTION
> >>> files?
> >>>
> >>> If this is documented in Writing R Extensions, I would be thankful
> >>> for a
> >>> page number and maybe a quick fix in my example below as so
> >> far I have
> >>> not been able to find a clear explanation.
> >>>
> >>> The problem can be illustrated by the following simple
> >> example (this
> >>> is
> >>> a simple code for 2 packages, pack1 and pack2; plus an example).
> >>>
> >>
> >> if you bothered to use R CMD check you would find your bug right
> >> away:
> >> * checking package dependencies ... ERROR
> >> Namespace dependencies not required:
> >> pack1
> >>
> >> You simply forgot to add pack1 to the Depends: line - that's
> >> all. Once
> >> you fix that, you'll see what happens:
> >>
> >>> library(pack2)
> >> Loading required package: pack1
> >>> as.POSIXct(pack1::testPosixVal)
> >> [1] "2009-01-14 01:38:08 UTC"
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> S
> >>
> >>
> >>> Thank you for your replies.
> >>>
> >>> Dr Oleg Sklyar
> >>> Research Technologist
> >>> AHL / Man Investments Ltd
> >>> +44 (0)20 7144 3107
> >>> osklyar at maninvestments.com
> >>>
> >>> --- pack1: DESCRIPTION ------
> >>> Package: pack1
> >>> Version: 0.0.1
> >>> Date: 12 Jan 2009
> >>> Title: pack1 to test S3/S4 methods compatibility
> >>> Author: Oleg Sklyar
> >>> Depends: R (>= 2.7.1), methods
> >>> Maintainer: Oleg Sklyar <osklyar at maninvestments.com>
> >>> Description: pack1
> >>> LazyLoad: yes
> >>> License: Proprietary
> >>> URL: http://www.maninvestments.com
> >>> LazyLoad: no
> >>>
> >>> --- pack1: NAMESPACE ------
> >>> import(methods)
> >>> exportPattern("^[^\\.]")
> >>> exportClasses(posixTime)
> >>> exportMethods(as.POSIXct)
> >>>
> >>> --- pack1: posix.R ------
> >>> setClass("posixTime", "numeric")
> >>>
> >>> setGeneric("as.POSIXct")
> >>> setMethod("as.POSIXct", signature(x="posixTime"),
> >>> function(x, tz) {
> >>> z = x at .Data
> >>> attr(z,"class") = c("POSIXt", "POSIXct")
> >>> attr(z,"tzone") = "UTC"
> >>> z
> >>> }
> >>> )
> >>>
> >>> testPosixVal = new("posixTime", as.numeric(Sys.time()))
> >>>
> >>> --- pack2: DESCRIPTION
> >>> Package: pack2
> >>> Version: 0.0.1
> >>> Date: 12 Jan 2009
> >>> Title: pack2 to test S3/S4 methods compatibility
> >>> Author: Oleg Sklyar
> >>> Depends: R (>= 2.7.1), methods
> >>> Maintainer: Oleg Sklyar <osklyar at maninvestments.com>
> >>> Description: pack2
> >>> LazyLoad: yes
> >>> License: Proprietary
> >>> URL: http://www.maninvestments.com
> >>> LazyLoad: no
> >>>
> >>> --- pack2: NAMESPACE ------
> >>> import(pack1)
> >>> exportPattern("^[^\\.]")
> >>>
> >>> --- pack2: posix.R ------
> >>> testPosix = function() {
> >>> z = as.POSIXct(testPosixVal)
> >>> print(z)
> >>> print(class(z))
> >>> z
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> ------ test code to run from global env, showing problems -------
> >>> require(pack2)
> >>>
> >>> ## use as.POSIXct imported into pack2 from pack1 to do the
> >>> conversion in
> >>> the fun
> >>> testPosix()
> >>> #~ [1] "2009-01-13 15:29:50 UTC"
> >>> #~ [1] "POSIXt" "POSIXct"
> >>> #~ [1] "2009-01-13 15:29:50 UTC"
> >>>
> >>> ## now try using it directly from the global env (pack1 was not
> >>> explicitly loaded)
> >>> as.POSIXct(pack1::testPosixVal)
> >>> #~ Error in as.POSIXct.default(pack1::testPosixVal) :
> >>> #~ do not know how to convert 'pack1::testPosixVal' to class
> >>> "POSIXlt"
> >>>
> >>> ## now require pack1 explicitly and try again
> >>> require(pack1)
> >>> as.POSIXct(pack1::testPosixVal)
> >>> #~ [1] "2009-01-13 15:29:50 UTC"
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> **********************************************************************
> >>> Please consider the environment before printing this email or its
> >>> attachments.
> >>> The contents of this email are for the named addressees
> >> ...{{dropped:
> >>> 19}}
> >>>
> >>> ______________________________________________
> >>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> **********************************************************************
> > Please consider the environment before printing this email or its
> > attachments.
> > The contents of this email are for the named addressees only. It
> > contains information which may be confidential and privileged. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
> > immediately, destroy this email and any attachments and do not
> > otherwise disclose or use them. Email transmission is not a secure
> > method of communication and Man Investments cannot accept
> > responsibility for the completeness or accuracy of this
> email or any
> > attachments. Whilst Man Investments makes every effort to keep its
> > network free from viruses, it does not accept
> responsibility for any
> > computer virus which might be transferred by way of this email or
> > any attachments. This email does not constitute a request, offer,
> > recommendation or solicitation of any kind to buy, subscribe, sell
> > or redeem any investment instruments or to perform other such
> > transactions of any kind. Man Investments reserves the right to
> > monitor, record and retain all electronic communications
> through its
> > network to ensure the integrity of its systems, for record keeping
> > and regulatory purposes.
> > Visit us at: www.maninvestments.com
> > TG0908
> >
> **********************************************************************
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the R-devel
mailing list